X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 7997;andrew.cmu.edu;Ted Anderson
Received: from beak.andrew.cmu.edu via trymail for +dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl@andrew.cmu.edu (->+dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl) (->ota+space.digests)
ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr1/ota/Mailbox/UbLola:00VcJQGjU59>;
Fri, 7 Dec 1990 03:01:43 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <UbLokv-00VcJIGhk5S@andrew.cmu.edu>
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: space+@Andrew.CMU.EDU
From: space-request+@Andrew.CMU.EDU
To: space+@Andrew.CMU.EDU
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 1990 03:01:00 -0500 (EST)
Subject: SPACE Digest V12 #634
SPACE Digest Volume 12 : Issue 634
Today's Topics:
NASA releases December 1990 Mixed Fleet Manifest (Forwarded)
BBXRT Status for 12/03/90 [1330 CST] (Forwarded)
Re: Another Russian first
Re: MIR broken?
Re: Sending Sen. Garn into space
UIT Status for 12/05/90 [1500 CST] (Forwarded)
Re: HST images via anonFTP and SPAN/HEPnet
Soyuz TM-11 to dock with Soviet Mir station early Dec. 4th
Re: Another Russian first
Re: space news from Oct 6 AW&ST
Administrivia:
Submissions to the SPACE Digest/sci.space should be mailed to
space+@andrew.cmu.edu. Other mail, esp. [un]subscription notices,
should be sent to space-request+@andrew.cmu.edu, or, if urgent, to
In article <1990Dec4.030007.23891@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, sfn20715@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve "il-Manhous" Norton) writes:
>
> How about :
> First billion dollars wasted on broken telescopes -- Hubble
Note that the problem is fixable, and probably will be fixed
in 1993 or so. It's not like the stupid thing is totally unusable...
it still returns results superior to almost anything possible from
the ground.
> First spacecraft explosion to kill all on board due
> to ground problems (faulty management) -- Challenger
How about the first pad failure to kill large numbers of ground
crew? (G-1 failure around 1968 or so.)
--
------------
The only drawback with morning is that it comes
at such an inconvenient time of day.
------------
------------------------------
Date: 4 Dec 90 22:39:01 GMT
From: sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!exodus!vygr.Eng.Sun.COM!mae@ucsd.edu (Mike Ekberg, Sun {DSGG.DGDO.Mid-Range Graphics.Egret(GS)} MS 8-04)
Subject: Re: space news from Oct 6 AW&ST
Note the two completely opposite development approaches of
the Soviet and NASA space programs.
(Here the Soviets are still re-using stuff >10 years(?) old)
In article <1990Dec4.025945.15482@zoo.toronto.edu> henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes:
>Almaz is a heavily modified Salyut space-station
>core with long radar arrays along its sides.
>
and ...
(We are building yet another from scratch design)
>NASA orders hiring freeze at space-station contractors, probably in
>anticipation of Yet Another Redesign -- largely inevitable given the
>likely budget cuts.
>
>Planetary Soviety invitation-only meeting to "critique" the current space
>station concludes that the current design is not viable even if nothing
>goes wrong with the shuttle, citing persistent reliance on unrealistic
>shuttle launch rates, inflexibility due to trying to meet too many users'
>needs, and inadequate consideration of alternatives. (On the other hand,
>some of the attendees commented that the deck was stacked: the choice
>of participants seemed to be deliberately aimed at such a conclusion.)
>
>Marshall is looking at the possibility of dividing the two big US modules
>into four, making it possible to launch them fully equipped.
>
--
# mike (sun!mae), M/S 8-04
"The people are the water, the army are the fish" Mao Tse-tung